Last Seen Contemporary Movie

[roshiq]

A Walk Among the Tombstones (2014)



It was okay, kinda slow at times. Not turned out as intriguing as it initially seems. But I think Koreans would have done something pretty exciting if they treated this concept of serial killer duo.

>>: B-

Exists (2014)



Interesting thing about it was for a found footage flick it was quite fast paced. Never been much fond of big foot story but it was entertaining.

>>: B

Ratline (2011)



A slow low budget trash with a ridiculously funny plot.

>>: C-

The Wolverine (2013)



>>: B-

[DeadbeatAtDawn]

V/H/S Viral, 2014. 3/10

Horrible.

[Ferox13]

Originally Posted by roshiq

Ratline (2011)

A slow low budget trash with a ridiculously funny plot.

I have a softspot for Eric Stanze but I rarely mention it in polite company.

[Manimal]

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2004432/?ref_=nv_sr_2

I just watched "Wolf Creek 2", and I am sad to say I was rather disappointed. I liked the first one, and still thought John Jarratt was scary and makes a great serial killer.. but it didn't have the same intensity as the first film. Definitely at least two good gore scenes, and had some interesting plot twists I didn't see coming.. However, it still fell sort of flat in the end. I would not be interested in watching another bad sequel if it happens.

I'd maybe give this one a 6 out of 10.

[horcrux2007]

Originally Posted by DeadbeatAtDawn

V/H/S Viral, 2014. 3/10

Horrible.

What didn't you like about it?

[Ferox13]

Originally Posted by Manimal

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2004432/?ref_=nv_sr_2

I just watched "Wolf Creek 2", and I am sad to say I was rather disappointed. I liked the first one, and still thought John Jarratt was scary and makes a great serial killer.. but it didn't have the same intensity as the first film

It was a totally different type of film - they dropped the gritty, nasty realism of the original and when more for laughs in the second. An odd choice though I did enjoy both in different ways/

[tfantasy]

Originally Posted by Manimal

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2004432/?ref_=nv_sr_2

I just watched "Wolf Creek 2", and I am sad to say I was rather disappointed. I liked the first one, and still thought John Jarratt was scary and makes a great serial killer.. but it didn't have the same intensity as the first film. Definitely at least two good gore scenes, and had some interesting plot twists I didn't see coming.. However, it still fell sort of flat in the end. I would not be interested in watching another bad sequel if it happens.

I'd maybe give this one a 6 out of 10.

I agree. I really enjoyed the first one but the second one was lacking sooo much....

I would compare it to The Hills Have Eyes remakes; the first one was awesome but the second one was pretty lame.

Some sequels just don't make the cut.

[Geordie9]

10/10

[Angra]

"Fury" 7/10

Definitely had some strong Spielberg vibes.

[Joe E Ville]

Babadook

A lot of hype surrounding the film. Now, I like a film that makes me think. This one did, however not in the way I'd prefer. Good atmosphere with muted colours. The acting was fine (I agree, the boy was annoying but he was supposed to be). I enjoyed the camera work, a few moments stand out (one with a disorienting sweeping motion). I'm not going to spoil anything. I was just left feeling underwhelmed. Very much liked the premise of the book and inviting danger into your home. I did find some similarities to another film which I won't name being that it may ruin this film for those that have yet to see it. Make your own judgment. Yes, there is a lot to like but not enough to make me love it. I figure a good determiner is if I would watch it again soon after the first viewing. No. But maybe in time. Essie Davis performance is without criticism. She impressed me.