Quote:
Originally Posted by PR3SSUR3
It might not be cosmetic, but it is still a procedure for lifestyle 'convenience' instead of a health necessity. Furthermore, considering it might be administered to do away with condoms, it seems odd to 'insure' a person for it who in all likelyhood may be more at risk to spread or receive AIDS.
|
If someone would fuck strange pussy without a condom, they'd do it with or without getting snipped. If someone has enough foresight to think "Hey, I don't want kids, and condoms fail 2-15% of the time, I should get a vasectomy" then they probably have enough foresight to think "man, this chick's crotch could be patient zero, I'd better wrap it up." Yeah, it could be considered a procedure of convenience, but it's just as much a procedure of prevention. I don't wanna knock anybody up, and I'm taking some responsibility for it. Insurance covers the pill in some cases, why not cover this?