![]() |
https://s29.postimg.org/tb18fzuwz/Dont_think_twice.jpg
Don't Think Twice (2016) I.M.D.B. When a member of a popular New York City improv troupe gets a huge break, the rest of the group - all best friends - start to realize that not everyone is going to make it after all. Well written and well performed and deals with its subject matter well while giving us an interesting look at improv. Has a few funny moments, although generally it's more amusing than funny. Worth a look. 7.5/10 |
|
STAR TREK:BEYOND (2016). ***1/2
|
VHS - 7/10
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2105044/?ref_=nv_sr_1 The surrounding anthology could do a bit better, but the individual stories are worked out well. They also have a few good moments and jump scares. The Ref - 8.5/10 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110955/ A great comedy in the vein of "The war of the roses", but with less physical comedy and - dare I say - sharper, wittier dialogue. Leary is good, but the arguing between Judy Davis and Kevin Spacey will have you in stitches. Spacey's line about nailing yourself to the cross is gold. |
Quote:
FINALLY got my hands on a copy of Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale. Watched it for the first time last night and looking forward to checking it out again soon. It had a few WTF moments and a pretty inventive plot. |
Quote:
Quote:
Oh yah, I remember The Ref. That was a great movie. And I've heard nothing but good about Rare Exports. |
Quote:
I'll check it out. Quote:
One of the better and more original (Christmas) horror movies of the last years. I'd say it's also the best Krampus movie while not actually being about Krampus. |
The Autopsy of Jane Doe, 2016. 7,5/10
http://nerdist.com/wp-content/upload...al-615x331.jpg Excellent! |
The Autopsy of Jane Doe (2016)
https://s29.postimg.org/jx0cz025j/Au...f_Jane_Doe.jpg If you were pleasantly surprised with Andre ovredal's TROLLHUNTER (2010), then you will regard him now as your new 'Master of Horror' - in his latest & first English-language film The Autopsy of Jane Doe! Because, in Jane Doe, this Norwegian director applied almost each & every great craftsmanship of horror film-making so skillfully that you are not only going to see just another good or passable horror flick set around an awesomely interesting premise, you'll going to experience it! Through the effective use of half light, sound & shadow this time he created an utterly eerie & unsettling atmosphere by revealing not too much but keep toying with the viewer's imagination from start to finish. And the perfect cast & characterization also helps to fuel the unease feeling of an unknown terror – an untouched & unidentified corpse of a beautiful young female; the local cops discovered the body from a shallow grave under the basement of a house-where everyone was massacred! The best horror film of 2016 so far! A must watch. >>: A |
|
Blair Witch (2016)
4/10 I like the first one and I like found footage but this was bad in many ways. According to Imdb, the budget for this one was about 5 million while the first one has an estimate of 60 thousand. As Above So Below, another found footage, also had a budget of about 5 million. That movie was made in Paris, has a bigger cast and looks more expensive with its props, sceneries, effects,... So where did all that Blair Witch budget go? Trees and dirt? |
https://s28.postimg.org/f9m77l7m1/Girl_Asleep.jpg
Girl Asleep (2015) I.M.D.B. The world is closing in on Greta Driscoll. On the cusp of turning fifteen she can't bear to leave her childhood, it contains all the things that give her comfort in this incomprehensible new world. Odd little movie, that starts out very Wes Anderson before delving further into symbolism and metaphors. It's a sweet little movie in places, but I was happy for the short run-time. Only Wes Anderson can do a Wes Anderson movie. 6.5/10 |
Watched The Mothman Prophecies. It's on my Christmas movie list, which guarantees that I toss it in the DVD player once a year. True, the Holiday is not a major part of the films theme but...this movie is a creepfest and the bit of Christmas-ness gives me an excuse to watch it every winter!
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Solid and original horror movie. Probably some mistake but on Imdb the length's 99 minutes. Version I saw was 86. I'm already looking forward to the director's next movie: Mortal. About a guy who gets godlike powers. Lead will be played by an actor from Misfits. I do hope it's R-Rated otherwise it might be another young adult fantasy adventure. |
Quote:
|
Can we call the nineties contemporary? Rewatched this today for the first time in ages. Great movie with some nice dark humour.
http://pics.filmaffinity.com/el_dia_...5908-large.jpg |
|
|
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story (2016)
https://s27.postimg.org/dlggn5cvn/Ro...rs_Story_1.jpg Absolutely loved it! Overall, a better accomplishment than The Force Awakens (which was more like an 'old wine in a new bottle' sort of reboot treatment, IMO). Nicely plotted a great prequel story for the NEW HOPE. Loved the characters as well as the way they "re-introduce" those iconic roles. Felicity Jones & Ben Mendelsohn as Director Orson Krennic were mostly impressive. >>: A Kubo and the Two Strings (2016) https://s28.postimg.org/clr3ze2nx/Kubo.jpg >>: A- |
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I enjoyed Rogue One more than Force Awakens too. I think Rogue, and I, were much more free of the prior Star Wars character baggage. As you say, "The Force Awakens (which was more like an 'old wine in a new bottle' sort of reboot treatment, IMO)." Force had too many winks at the prior films, creating an unwelcome dissociative experience (nudging me that I'm watching a film about a film). I liked all 6 (prior) Star Wars films, which knew how to move forward -- not always in a good way, but at least creating a new experience, and often more than just entertainment. So I give Rogue green for a new experience, but I can't say I thought Rogue or Force Awakens were very good. I thought they mildly entertaining. I thought Rogue's main characters were too undeveloped for me to know or care about them. But at least their motivations were clear (unlike Force Awakens). I give Force Awakens points for being intriguing, whereas I don't think either created enough deep cinematic suspense. What you think of the use of CG human characters? |
Quote:
|
Christmas Cruelty! , 2013. 7/10
http://horrornews.net/wp-content/upl...r-Tomren-5.jpg http://horrornews.net/wp-content/upl...r-Tomren-1.jpg |
Quote:
The thing that I mostly liked about the R1 was it's about the unsung heroes of the rebellions who were also fighting for the same great cause but without much direct influence of the Force or some Jedi backup. Found mostly the Cargo pilot guy who was the messenger for Galen Erso was underdeveloped or needed some back story. One thing I'm still looking forward to see a strong, important or bad ass good guy sort of character from other species (obviously with human traits/values) other than just for some comic relief or as a side kick in this new saga. For example, they could have made the Rebel intelligence office Cassian somewhat like that. But liked the addition of Asian characters - Chirrut & Baze into the story. Thought the action scenes, particularly the final battle was pretty awesome, better executed than TFA. I don't have any complain of using CG characters as long the story needs them there as now they have the supportive tech to properly fit them in, but yeah...surprised to see the CGI Grand Moff Tarkin got that much good amount of screen time here. It kinda gave me goosebumps, man! |
The Accountant (2016)
B/C Decent action-thriller but some bits were too predictable. Also expected more action. Uncle Nick (2015) C Drama/comedy but the drama made the comedy seem kinda unnecessary. |
|
Quote:
|
ESCAPE FROM LA (1996). Big disappointment here-came out too long after the original and borrows way too much from NEW YORK. *1/2
|
|
SILENT NIGHT 2012
A deranged Santa sets about punishing those on his naughty list. Some festive fun for sure. |
Quote:
And yes, I really hope the sequel to Force Awakens has some very new film experiences, concepts, stories and characters, cause Force was way too fandom for me. I most decidedly think it was a mistake to use a CG face of Peter Cushing because when I saw him it completely took me out of the film/story! I didn't catch a word Tarkin said because I was immediately studying that face and voice... first thinking "Is Mr Cushing still alive?". Then I was studying the life-likeness levels of the face and movement, judging it. Then I was assessing if that was Cushing voice, even maybe a digital recreation... which is a compliment to actor Guy Henry, who did the voice, and was the body actor. I wouldn't have minded an actor that looked like an ever so slightly younger looking Peter Cushing. I'm mean, let's be real here... Cushing was a minor character, only appearing in A New Hope, a 1977 film. Or just don't use Tarkin. The story didn't require him, and certainly didn't require showing him. In that respect, thinking about it now... it really was a fandom appearance. |
|
Gabriel Iglesias: I'm Sorry For What I Said When I Was Hungry
|
|
Lowlife, 2012. 8/10
http://horror.wpengine.netdna-cdn.co...fe-damon-1.jpg I must own this, its magnificent. Two drug addicts want to get high and stay high...they suck the fluids from starfish, called slugs in the movie. The scenes in here are just amazing. It comes in B&W and color. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 PM. |